Why is Emily Dickinson important?
Emily Dickinson Biography:
Emily Dickinson was born in Amherst, Massachusetts, on December 10, 1830, and died some fifty-five years later on May 15, 1886. Except for a few visits to Boston, Philadelphia, and Washington, D.C., and some nine months at school at South Hadley, Massachusetts, she spent her whole life in Amherst, most of it in the large meadow-surrounded house called the Dickinson Homestead, across the street from a cemetery. From 1840 to 1855, she lived with her family in a house on North Pleasant Street, after which they returned to the Homestead. She never married and lived comfortably dependent on her well-to-do father and his estate, though she did more than her share of household chores while creating a large body of poems and letters.
Amherst, a farm-based community, grew in her lifetime from about 2,700 to about 4,200 inhabitants. It was the seat of Amherst College, a citadel of Protestant orthodoxy, and later of Massachusetts Agricultural and Mechanical College (now the University of Massachusetts). Though somewhat isolated, Amherst had an excellent private academy, a wealthy but mixed cultural tradition of reading the Bible, Shakespeare, and the classics, and, as the nineteenth century progressed, contemporary American authors and a large amount of popular and sentimental literature became current there. Social life was mainly confined to church affairs, college receptions, agricultural shows, and such private socializing as walking, carriage riding, and discussing books. Newspapers and magazines from Springfield and Boston brought current literature and opinion, severe and brief, to the more literate. The Dickinson clan were old Yankee stock, tolerant of such religious dissidence as Unitarianism and Roman Catholicism, but deeply rooted in the orthodox Protestant tradition as it lived on in their Congregational church (and the Presbyterian church), still actively Calvinistic and requiring public profession of faith for membership. Waves of religious enthusiasm and conversion swept through Amherst, especially during Emily Dickinson’s early years, and gathered up her friends and members of her family, but never her.
Little is known of Emily Dickinson’s earliest years. She spent four years at a primary school and then attended Amherst Academy from 1840 to 1847, somewhat irregularly because of poor health. She wrote imaginatively for school publications, but none of these writings survive. Her intense letters to friends and classmates show a variety of tones, especially in her reluctance to embrace Christ and join the church and in her anticipations and fears about the prospect of married life. As she understood the idea, the world was dearer to her than the renunciations that conversion seemed to require, and quite possibly, she sensed something false or soft-minded in the professions of others. In a period of rigorous living conditions, without the benefits of modern medicine, life spans were shorter than ours, and Dickinson suffered the early deaths of many acquaintances and dear friends. She witnessed several deaths, doubtlessly impressed and shocked by the Puritan doctrine that looked for signs of election and salvation in the demeanor of the dying and especially in their willingness to die.
During this period, she was fond of, or attached to, two older men, Leonard Humphrey (1824–50), the young principal of Amherst Academy, and Benjamin Franklin Newton (1821–53), a law student in her father’s office. Newton, a Unitarian and something of an Emersonian discussed literature, ideas, and religion with her and praised her early poetic efforts. After he left her father’s office and moved to Worcester, he married and soon died of tuberculosis. Dickinson felt a warm, sisterly affection for him, and on learning of his death, she worried about the state and future of his soul. It was a kind of worry that she would continue to experience throughout the rest of her life about the many people she cared for. Romantic inclinations towards Humphrey and Newton seem extremely unlikely for Dickinson, but these men are probably related to the descriptions of several losses in her early poems. In the fall of 1847, Dickinson began the first two-year program at Mount Holyoke Female Seminary in South Hadley, where she did not yield to continued pressures to give up the secular world for Christ and join the church. A good student and fond of her classmates and teachers, she suffered from homesickness and poor health and did not return for the second year.
Her immediate family were the most critical people in Dickinson’s life. Her father, Edward Dickinson (1803–74), a graduate of Yale law college, was a successful lawyer and Amherst’s chief citizen under his imposing personality, his connection with Amherst College (its treasurer), his two terms in the state legislature, his one time in the United States Congress, and his leadership in civic endeavors. A man of unbending demeanor and righteousness, he appears to have had a softer side that he struggled to conceal. It came out in incidents of pleasure in nature, kindliness to people, and the embarrassed desire for more intimacy with his children than he ever allowed himself. He joined the church at the age of fifty. Dickinson expressed her distress over his death in many poems and letters. In some sense, she may have lived in his shadow, but she went her way and saw him with a critical and tender eye. He probably appears in some of her poems about deprivation and explosive behavior. He unlikely made any explicit attempts to keep either of his daughters from marrying, although he probably communicated his need for their presence and support.
A clear picture of Dickinson’s mother, Emily Norcross Dickinson (1804–82), is challenging to formulate. She seems dignified, conventional, reasonably intelligent, and probably subservient to her husband. She suffered periods of poor health, probably of emotional origin, and her husband’s death shattered her health. Dickinson and her sister, Lavinia, cared for her as an invalid for the last four years of her life, during which Dickinson’s affection for her significantly increased. Dickinson’s declaration to T. W. Higginson, her chief literary correspondent, that she “never had a mother” is poetically exaggerated.
Dickinson’s sister and brother, Lavinia (1833–99) and William Austin, always known as Austin (1829–95), were close to her all her life. Lavinia was a vibrant, pretty, and clever girl but not particularly intellectual, although she had a reputation for having a sharp tongue. She seems to have rejected several marriage offers, possibly to remain Dickinson’s lifelong companion. Fiercely protective of her elder sister, she probably tried to shield the ever more reclusive Dickinson, and she may have understood Dickinson’s need for time and privacy for her poems. Austin was more imaginative and intellectual than his father, had an artistic side, and was interested in new ideas. After finishing law school and marrying, he succumbed to his father’s pressures not to leave Amherst for Chicago, became his father’s law partner, and settled for life in a house across the street from the Dickinson home. Partly because of Dickinson’s influence, he married Susan Gilbert, who had long been a close friend of Dickinson’s. The marriage was unhappy, and its increasing tensions were probably visible to those in the house across the street.
Dickinson’s relationship with her sister-in-law is very revealing and is relevant to these Notes. It was in the early 1850s that Susan Gilbert (later Dickinson) (1830–1913), an orphan, came to live with relatives in Amherst and became Dickinson’s dearest friend. They shared books, ideas, and friends. After a stormy courtship, Susan married Austin in 1856. A woman of attractiveness, intelligence, assertive social demeanor, and a stinging tongue, Susan became the social leader of Amherst. Her relationship with Dickinson remained highly ambivalent, Dickinson suffering from Susan’s sarcasm mixed with her tenderness and also from Susan’s pressures to make her submit to conventional religion. Dickinson wrote warm and revealing letters and poems to Susan but seemed to have become quite disillusioned with her. However, her fondness for Austin and Susan’s three children and her sympathy for her brother kept her bonds with Susan partly whole. The death of Gilbert Dickinson (1875–83), Austin and Susan’s youngest child, was a terrible blow to Dickinson.
During the 1850s, Dickinson made the most of her few travels outside Amherst, visiting Boston, Washington, and Philadelphia, but she was becoming more reclusive; she stopped attending church services (she had been a keen observer and often sarcastic commentator on sermons), and she spent much of her time writing poems. Towards the end of the decade, Dickinson seemed to be approaching several emotional crises. In her early twenties, she had experienced some regular social attention from young men, but probably none of them constituted what one could call courtship. In 1858, 1861, and 1862 (these dates are approximate), she wrote draft copies of three fervent letters to someone whom she addressed as “Master” while calling herself “Daisy.” The letters are anguished descriptions of a guilty, rejected, and subservient love. These letters were never sent. They are the most robust evidence that a desperate and impossible love was the chief source of her crises, although there is no proof.
Among the many candidates advanced as Dickinson’s secret love, two men have been singled out as being most likely: the Reverend Charles Wadsworth (1814–82) of Philadelphia and San Francisco, and Samuel Bowles (1826–78), editor of the Springfield Republican and a lifelong friend of the Edward and Austin Dickinson families. Charles Wadsworth was a successful orthodox preacher who was sober but imaginative, rigorous yet tender.
Dickinson probably heard him preach in Philadelphia in 1855. He visited her in Amherst, and of his correspondence with Dickinson, only a short letter from him to her survives, revealing a pastoral concern for unspecified distress. After his death, Dickinson wrote of him in various endearing terms, calling him her “dearest earthly friend.” Happily married and the father of several children, Wadsworth must have been entirely unaware of any romantic attachment which Dickinson may have felt for him. The fact that Wadsworth’s San Francisco church was called Calvary and that many of Dickinson’s love poems employ religious allusions have suggested but do not prove that she was romantically infatuated with Wadsworth.
Samuel Bowles is a more likely candidate for the person addressed in Dickinson’s so-called Master Letters. An extraordinarily handsome and worldly man, Bowles numbered many women among his friends, much to his wife’s pain. A frequent visitor at the Dickinsons, he may have tempted Emily to plead with him for recognition of her poetic ability, an award which he was quite unable to give. Emily Dickinson’s letters to him bear significant similarities to the Master’s letters, and she sent him many poems, including “Title divine — is mine!” (1072); this one was accompanied by a note, which may imply that in her imagination, he was her husband. Various details of the lives and travels of both Wadsworth and Bowles fit selectively into Dickinson’s comments on separations and losses which she suffered, but others do not. Possibly Dickinson worshipped in her imagination a composite of these two men or a version of someone else who cannot be identified. Her emotional crises of the early 1860s may also stem from her fear about the condition of her eyes (which, in turn, may have been of emotional origin), fears for her sanity in connection with these difficulties and with family instabilities, or a combination of love-desperation with all of these frustrations. She may also have been desperate because no one could recognize her poetic gifts. Her increasing reclusiveness and her continually wearing white dresses may be chiefly related to the idea that, in spirit, she was married to someone; this may suggest that in addition to all these conflicts, there was a need for time and privacy for her writing and an increasing conviction that she derived more satisfaction from living in a world of her poems than in ordinary society. In any case, her poetic productivity from 1861 to about 1866 continued astonishingly. The figure of an unattainable lover looms large in her poems, but it is probably a mistake to think that a frustrated love was the chief cause of her becoming a poet. Nevertheless, one must grant that her writing served as an emotional catharsis and a healing therapy for her, contributing to its appeal.
Emily Dickinson’s chief attempt to establish contact with the literary world and gain recognition for her poems began in 1862 when she wrote a letter to Thomas Wentworth Higginson (1823–1911) and sent him the first of many packets of poems. Dickinson responded to advice that Higginson had offered young writers in the Atlantic Monthly. Higginson was a minister, editor, writer, soldier, and champion of liberal causes. Emily Dickinson’s correspondence with him, which continued almost until her death, is the most essential part of her correspondence, and Higginson, who visited her in 1870 and 1873, has left the most detailed reports of her conversation that we have. Higginson recognized in Dickinson a sensitive, gifted, and imaginative person, but he could not see her work as poetry; he described it as beautiful thoughts and words, and he cautioned her against early publication, trying to steer her towards conventional form and expression, and trying to draw her into society. She pretended to accept all his criticism and to plead for a continued tutor-mentor relationship. Still, she seems to have recognized all his limitations and drawn sustenance from his personal rather than literary support. Higginson probably appears in several of Dickinson’s poems about the relationship between artist and audience. After Dickinson’s death, Higginson helped edit her poems, and their widespread success significantly advanced his opinion of them.
During Emily Dickinson’s lifetime, only seven of her poems appeared in print — all unsigned and all altered and damaged by editors. She had probably agreed to only a few of these publications. Five of these poems appeared in Bowles’s Springfield Republican. One appeared in 1878 in the anonymous anthology A Masque of Poets, indeed as a result of the persuasion of Dickinson’s only other crucial literary friend, Helen Hunt Jackson (1830–85), who, as Helen Fiske, had been among Dickinson’s childhood friends in Amherst. After the death of her first husband, Helen Hunt, Jackson became a successful poet and novelist (famous for Ramona, 1884). In the 1870s, she wrote to and visited Dickinson, became convinced of her greatness as a poet, and tried to persuade her to publish. Her only success, however, was to convince Dickinson to contribute “Success is counted sweetest” (67) to A Masque of Poets, but she told Dickinson that she was a great poet. Dickinson’s correspondence shows a warm affection for her.
The other meaningful relationship of Emily Dickinson’s later years was her reciprocated love for Judge Otis P. Lord (1812–84), a friend of her father’s, who became Dickinson’s close friend after he was widowed in 1877. Dickinson’s letters to him are genuine with bashful love. He seems to have proposed, and she seems to have refused in the name of her persisting sense that fulfillment would have overwhelmed her. Lord’s death in 1884 seems to have shocked Dickinson into a rapid physical decline. Some writers say he appears in a few of her late poems.
After withdrawing from the world in the early 1860s, Dickinson’s life revolved around her correspondence, poetry, and household duties. She remained a faithful daughter and sister, and in her terms, she was a loyal friend to many to whom she related chiefly through letters. Her later reclusiveness may have approached a particular pathological state, as evidenced by her turning friends away and sometimes conversing and listening to music through only slightly opened doors. But Dickinson insisted she did not suffer from isolation and felt deeply fulfilled and in intimate contact with the world. Her correspondence with Higginson probably convinced her that her poems would find no significant or sympathetic audience during her lifetime, for though she protested to Higginson that she did not want publication, it is evident that she wanted to make her relatives proud of her work after she died. Her combination of pride and resignation probably stemmed from her awareness of her extraordinary gift and her frustration that so many people were as mystified by her poems as by her talk. Many of the lyrics give eloquent testimony that she longed for an audience. As luck would have it, her poems survived. But their struggle for adequate publication, understanding, and recognition almost parallels her inner life in its complexity.
Read also: Why is Emily Dickinson important?